Incorrect Result Raising 10 to Very Large/Very Small Power

In the versions of Microsoft Excel listed at the beginning of this article, if you enter a formula in which the value 10 is raised to either a very large power or a very small power, the formula may return an incorrect result: NOTE: These problems do not occur in earlier versions of Microsoft Excel. Also, the problems do not occur when you raise a value other than 10 to a very large power or a very small power; for example, =9^10000000000 correctly returns a #NUM! error.

These problems occur when you enter a formula in which the value 10 is raised to a power in one of the following ranges:

• greater than or equal to 2^31 (2,147,483,648) and less than or equal to 10^308 (1 followed by 308 zeroes) -or-
  
  
• less than or equal to -(2^31) (-2,147,483,648) and greater than or equal to -(10^308) (-1 followed by 308 zeroes)

For example: These formulas should all return a #NUM! error, because the largest positive number allowed in Microsoft Excel is 9.99999999999999E+307, which is just less than 10^308. Or: These formulas should all return the value 0, because the smallest positive number allowed in Microsoft Excel is 1E-307, which is just above 0.

To prevent this problem from occurring, make sure that formulas in your workbooks do not raise the number 1.797 to a power larger than 308 or the number 2.225 smaller than -308.

Microsoft has confirmed this to be a problem in the Microsoft products listed at the beginning of this article.

Microsoft Excel supports positive values almost as large as 10^308 (a one followed by 308 zeroes) and almost as small as 10^-308 (a decimal point, followed by 308 zeroes and a one). Similar negative values are also supported. Smaller values are rounded to 0, and larger values are converted into a #NUM! error value.

For comparison, note that the estimated number of elementary particles in the known universe is 10^80, or a one followed by 80 zeroes. The smallest value used in physics is roughly 10^-33 centimeters, the scale at which quantum fluctuations are believed to exist. These values are well within the limits supported by Microsoft Excel; so, Microsoft Excel can work with any meaningful number in the universe.

With respect to the largest formula shown above: note that a googol is 10^100, or a 1 followed by 100 zeroes, and that a googolplex is 10^googol, or a 1 followed by 10^100 zeroes.

The correct result of the third formula shown above, =10^(1E+308), is a 1 followed by 10^308 zeroes. So, the result of the third formula is equivalent to the following: So, it would take over (1 followed by 10^307 zeroes) universes to contain (1 followed by 10^308 zeroes) elementary particles.