Article ID: 182781 - Last Review: November 1, 2006 - Revision: 1.3 Client Connections to Multihomed Server Not Load BalancedThis article was previously published under Q182781 SYMPTOMS
You have a number of clients that are using TCP/IP to connect to a
multihomed server that has no IP addresses on the same subnet as the client
and the clients are always connecting to the same address on the server,
even though the paths to more than one of the addresses are equal.
CAUSE
When the client's NetBT layer attempts to resolve the NetBIOS name to an IP
address, it queries the WINS server for the address of a multihomed server
and receives a list of addresses that are always in the same order. NetBT
then takes that list and sorts it, putting addresses on the same subnet (if
any) at the top, followed by addresses in the same network class, and then
any remaining addresses. It then starts at the top of this list and pings
the first address to make sure it is valid. If it does not get a reply, it
will go on to the next address; if it does get a reply, it will use the
first address.
The problem is that, within these three categories, the order of addresses is left unchanged from the list provided by the WINS server. This means that, as long as the first address in the list is online, it will be the one that is always used by every client, which does not provide for load balancing. For additional information, please see the following article in the Microsoft Knowledge Base:
ARTICLE-ID: 161425
(http://support.microsoft.com/kb/161425/EN-US/
)
TITLE : WinNT 4.0 SP2 Multi-Homed Computer Connection Enhancement RESOLUTIONTo resolve this problem, obtain the latest service pack for Windows NT 4.0 or Windows NT Server 4.0, Terminal Server Edition. For additional information, click the following article number to view the article in the
Microsoft Knowledge Base:
152734
(http://support.microsoft.com/kb/152734/EN-US/
)
How to Obtain the Latest Windows NT 4.0 Service Pack
STATUSMicrosoft has confirmed that this is a problem in Windows NT 4.0 and Windows NT Server 4.0, Terminal Server Edition. This problem was first corrected in Windows NT 4.0 Service Pack 4.0 and Windows NT Server 4.0, Terminal Server Edition Service Pack 4. | Article Translations
|
Back to the top
