Article ID: 187915 - Last Review: October 28, 2006 - Revision: 3.3 XCON: MTA Routes Messages to EDK Connector when Alternate Route ExistsThis article was previously published under Q187915 SYMPTOMS
If an Exchange Development Kit (EDK) Connector is installed on an Exchange
Server 5.5 computer, and the EDK Connector has the same address space as
another Exchange connector, the Exchange message transfer agent (MTA) will
possibly route messages incorrectly to the EDK Connector.
MORE INFORMATION
For example, a company develops an EDK Connector that can handle X.400
addressing schemes. This company also has to send X.400 mail out an X.400
Connector. This is not a problem if the address spaces are different. But
if the same message handling capability is needed for both connectors, this
presents a problem.
On a typical X.400 Connector for an entire organization, the address space is X400:c=*. If both connectors have c=*, it is possible for messages that are meant for the EDK Connector to be routed out the X.400 Connector, resulting in a non-delivery report (NDR). The problem is also manifested by incoming messages from the EDK Connector into Exchange. If the message coming into Exchange is routed right back to the EDK Connector, an NDR will be generated if the message travels out the X.400 Connector. Microsoft has changed the behavior of the Exchange MTA in Exchange Server version 5.5 Service Pack 2. The MTA now checks to see which connector the message originated from. If there is a duplicate route that is equally weighted in all categories, the MTA tries the duplicate route rather than sending the message back to the originating EDK Connector. RESOLUTION
To resolve this problem, obtain the latest service pack for Exchange Server
version 5.5. For more information, please see the following article in the
Microsoft Knowledge Base:
191014
(http://support.microsoft.com/kb/191014/EN-US/
)
XGEN: How to Obtain the Latest Exchange Server 5.5 Service Pack
STATUS
Microsoft has confirmed this to be a problem in Microsoft Exchange Server
version 5.5. This problem was first corrected in Exchange Server 5.5
Service Pack 2.
| Article Translations
|

Back to the top
