Article ID: 239209 - Last Review: January 25, 2007 - Revision: 3.1 Works 2000: Date Formula in Database File Does Not Merge CorrectlyThis article was previously published under Q239209 SYMPTOMS
When you perform a mail merge in Microsoft Works 2000 Word Processor or Microsoft Word, and you then use a date formula in your Works Database data source file, the results in the mail merge document are different than the data displayed in the Database data source file.
For example, if one of the fields in your Database data source file has the date formula =DATE(2001,1,1), the serial number value for this formula is 36892. However, when you use this field in a mail merge document, the result is the short date 1/1/2001, instead of the serial number, 36892. CAUSE
This behavior can occur because when Works 2000 performs the mail merge, Works 2000 interprets the date formula as the date itself. So, instead of merging the date formula, Works 2000 displays the short date instead.
RESOLUTION
To work around this issue, follow these steps:
STATUSMicrosoft has confirmed that this is a problem in the Microsoft products that are listed at the beginning of this article. MORE INFORMATIONFor more information about performing a mail merge, click Microsoft Works Help on the
Help menu, type mail merge in the Office Assistant or
the Answer Wizard, and then click Search to view the topics
returned. | Article Translations
|


Back to the top
