Article ID: 315447 - Last Review: September 27, 2005 - Revision: 7.2 FIX: SQL Server 2000 may be more aggressive with Lazy Writes than SQL Server 7.0This article was previously published under Q315447 BUG #: 356443 (SHILOH_BUGS) SYMPTOMS Under the following conditions Lazy Writes activity in SQL
Server 2000 may be much higher than previous versions, which may cause other
side effects:
RESOLUTION
To resolve this problem, obtain the latest service pack for SQL Server 2000. For more information, click the following article number to view the article in the Microsoft Knowledge Base:
290211
(http://support.microsoft.com/kb/290211/
)
How to obtain the latest SQL Server 2000 service pack
NoteThe following hotfix was created before the release of Microsoft
SQL Server 2000 Service Pack 3. The English version of this hotfix has the file attributes (or later file attributes) that are listed in the following table. The dates and times for these files are listed in Coordinated Universal Time (UTC). When you view the file information, it is converted to local time. To find the difference between UTC and local time, use the Time Zone tab in the Date and Time tool in Control Panel. Date Time Version Size File name ----------------------------------------------------- 2001-12-21 18:22 8.00.0558 7,442,513 Sqlservr.exe 2001-12-21 18:21 8.00.0558 590,396 Sqlsort.dll Note This fix alone does not limit the amount of Lazy Write activity. Microsoft has added a new trace flag, 809, to limit the amount of Lazy Write activity. To add trace flag 809 as a SQL Server startup parameter:
WORKAROUND To work around this problem you can either:
STATUS
Microsoft has confirmed that this is a problem in Microsoft SQL Server 2000.
This problem was first corrected in Microsoft SQL Server 2000 Service Pack 3. MORE INFORMATION The removal of the sp_configure stored procedure option max async io in SQL Server 2000, allows much greater levels of Lazy Write
activity. The new trace flag 809 limits the amount of Lazy Writes that can
occur in a short period of time.
| Article Translations
|
Back to the top
