Select the product you need help with
LDAP queries are executed more slowly than expected in the AD or LDS/ADAM directory service and Event ID 1644 may be loggedArticle ID: 951581 - View products that this article applies to. SYMPTOMSOn a Windows Server 2003-based or Windows Server 2008-based computer that uses an Active
Directory Lightweight Directory Services (AD LDS) or Active Directory
Application Mode (AD/AM) directory service, certain applications do not perform at the performance
levels that are expected. When you enable field engineering (debug) logging to trace an LDAP query, the following event log shows that the LDAP query is an inefficient query: Event ID : 1644 Additionally, you experience a slow response time. When you inspect the attributes in the search filter, you find that they all have indexes that are defined. Additionally, if attributes do not have indexes that are defined, and you add the indexes through a schema change, the problem persists. CAUSEWhen you create a network trace of the LDAP query, you
notice that it
is a paged query. However, the LDAP server can only use one index to process a paged query. This is because LDAP does not have a transaction to end a query, and the implementation for paged searches does not create an expensive context for the query. WORKAROUNDTo work around this problem, you
can send the query without
using the paged query control. By
default,
paged queries are always
enabled for some LDAP client libraries. Therefore,
you
may have
to write additional code in your application to enable and disable paged
queries as appropriate for
your specific situation. STATUSMicrosoft
has confirmed that this is a problem in the Microsoft products that are listed
in the "Applies to" section. MORE INFORMATION
For more information, click the following article number to view the article in the Microsoft Knowledge Base:
314980
(http://support.microsoft.com/kb/314980/
)
How
to configure Active Directory diagnostic event logging in Windows Server 2003
and in Windows 2000 Server
PropertiesArticle ID: 951581 - Last Review: November 9, 2010 - Revision: 3.0 APPLIES TO
|


Back to the top








