Article ID: 954420 - View products that this article applies to.
This article describes why Windows Server 2008-based computers that are configured for Network Load Balancing (NLB) in a failover cluster cannot be used as print servers. This article also describes the different ways to configure efficient print servers.
Network Load Balancing (NLB) that is configured in a failover cluster offers high performance in environments in which each request from a client is stateless, and there is no in-memory application state to maintain. You cannot implement this configuration together with a print server. This is because print servers maintain lots of state information for each printer and client with which they are communicating. Print jobs may span several communication requests. Therefore, all requests must be handled by the same node. In a failover cluster environment, only a single node communicates with print devices and client computers at one time. Most networked print devices can deal with multiple requests from different computers on the network. However, each print server or cluster node is aware only of its load on the printer. Each server or node can spool jobs only when the print device reports that it is ready to accept new jobs. Print devices typically accept only one print job at a time.
When a print job is given to a print server, the print job itself can span multiple communication requests between the client and the server. In an NLB environment, you cannot make sure that each request is being processed by the same node. Other information, such as print job status information, would not even be possible in a NLB cluster configuration. This is because each node would have no information about the work that is being processed by the other nodes.
Because of the resource limitations in the print devices and their communication process with specific nodes in a cluster, NLB failover clustering cannot be used for a print server. Even if it were possible to send a print job successfully to an NLB failover cluster, there would be no gains in the general performance, and it would come at a significant loss of functionality and network efficiency. Gains in performance on a specific print server (failover cluster or stand-alone) would be easier to achieve by using other strategies that would not affect the management functionality of the print infrastructure.
How to configure an efficient print serverWhen the load of a print server is too high, and print requests can no longer be serviced even while printers are sitting idle, follow these steps to improve the throughput on the servers:
For environments that require high availability, you can use a failover cluster as a print server. If a node in the cluster fails, all print functionality will fail over to the next node in the cluster. To improve failover times, we recommend that the administrator for the cluster force failover to each node when new print drivers are installed on the server. During a failover, the driver installation is forced to occur on the active node. The installation of the driver on each node can require several minutes. Forcing this installation process during maintenance will make sure that any unplanned failovers during usual operation will be very quick, because the drivers will already be installed on each node.
Article ID: 954420 - Last Review: September 11, 2010 - Revision: 1.1