INFO: Clarification of the "g" Format Specifier for printf()

已淘汰的 KB 內容免責聲明

本文章所撰寫之相關產品,Microsoft 已不再提供支援。 因此,本文章將以「現狀」提供,並且將不再更新。

Summary


In Microsoft C, the output format resulting from the printf() format specifier "g" does not exactly match the output format resulting from either format specifier "e" or "f". The documentation states that "g" will use either the "f" or "e" format, whichever is more compact. This is true in the sense of the overall format but there are some differences.


The precision value is interpreted differently in "g" format than in "f" format. The documentation explains this difference. The precision for "f" specifies the number of digits after the decimal point. The precision for "g" specifies the maximum number of significant digits printed. The following example demonstrates the difference described in the SUMMARY:

Sample Code

#include <stdio.h>

void main (void)
{
double x = 2.0/3.0; /* 0.666... */
double y;

y = 6.0 + x;
printf ("%.4g\n", y);
printf ("%.4f\n", y);
printf ("%.4e\n\n", y);

y = 66.0 + x;
printf ("%.4g\n", y);
printf ("%.4f\n", y);
printf ("%.4e\n\n", y);

y = 666.0 + x;
printf ("%.4g\n", y);
printf ("%.4f\n", y);
printf ("%.4e\n\n", y);

y = 6666.0 + x;
printf ("%.4g\n", y);
printf ("%.4f\n", y);
printf ("%.4e\n\n", y);

y = 66666.0 + x;
printf ("%.4g\n", y); /* switches to "e" notation here */
printf ("%.4f\n", y);
printf ("%.4e\n\n", y);
}
The results of the above program are correct as shown below:


6.667
6.6667
6.6667e+000

66.67
66.6667
6.6667e+001

666.7
666.6667
6.6667e+002

6667
6666.6667
6.6667e+003

6.667e+004
66666.6667
6.6667e+004
內容

文章識別碼:43392 - 最後檢閱時間:2003年12月8日 - 修訂: 1

意見反應